Thursday, June 03, 2004
Well, it looks like things are moving toward a peaceful resolution here. Lesson one has to be relearned again and again: tone is impossible to control in an e-mail. I read things that weren't there and other people heard things not said by me. The larger issue that I am wrestling, wrestling, wrestling with is power. Like many of us, my self-image has not caught up to my adult reality: it's all too easy for me to return mentally to the 4th grade lunchroom. I have not always taken responsibility for the influence I may have or even the threat I might be perceived as simply because it doesn't usually occur to me that I have any real power. But I do, of courseanyone with a public voice doesand that means taking responsibility, treading lightly where I need to and knowing I can be effective on my own behalf or on the behalf of others. It also means recognizing that I will inevitably be attacked for simply having a modicum of power, whether I exercise it consciously or not. This is hard for me to come to terms with. In spite of cultural-studies instincts that tell me "everything is political," I am not by nature a very political person. I have no taste for intrigue or conspiracy, even in a good cause. (Fourier would say I rank low in the "cabalist" passion.) While I realize in the abstract that people might talk unkindly about me behind my back, it doesn't occur to me to be on guard about such a thing. In fact the en garde position is entirely foreign to this would-be avant-gardeist (or avant-garde sympathizer). Malice shocks and dismays me every time because I refuse to concede that my ambition (to be a better poet, to be a well-published poet, to influence the world for the better, and not least to get and keep a good job) means that I am taking the food out of someone else's mouth. Why should poetry, of all ridiculous things, be tied to an economy of scarcity? I want to believe that there's turf enough for all who want itbetter, that we can each build the structures we need on the "land" we already possess. Naive? Probably. But without such naivety, how to preserve the open-heartedness which makes my life worth living and my poetry worthh writing? That might be lesson two, a far more difficult trick.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Popular Posts
-
This is gonna be a loooooong post. What follows is a freely edited transcription of my notes from the Zukofsky/100 conference at Columbia t...
-
Midway through my life's journey comes a long moment of reflection and redefinition regarding poetics (this comes in place of the conver...
-
Will be blogging more or less permanently now at http://www.joshua-corey.com/blog/ . Or follow me on Twitter: @joshcorey
-
My title is taken from the comments stream of an article recently published by The Chronicle of Higher Education , David Alpaugh's ...
-
Elif Batuman has amplified her criticism of the discipline of creative writing (which I've written about before ) in a review-essay that...
-
Thursday, September 29, 2011 Berlin. Fog of sleep deprivation coloring an otherwise perfect blue autumn day a sort of miasmic yellow i...
-
Trained it down to DePaul's Loop campus this morning to take part in a panel, "Why Writers Should Blog," alongside Tony Trigil...
-
In one week Lake Forest will hold its commencement and I'll take off my professor's hat for the summer. A few weeks later, in June, ...
-
Farewell, Barbara Guest .
-
That's one of my own lines. From an untitled (they're all untitled) severance song: After form fails a furling, reports dying away, ...
No comments:
Post a Comment